Two things developers and investors keep getting wrong: what an asset really costs to run after close, and how ready operations are when the keys change hands. ReadyInfra advises on both—and holds its own sites to the same standard.
Acquisition diligence answers what you are buying. Operational readiness answers whether you can run it. Everything below serves one or the other.
Independent technical and operational diligence on sites, assets, and platforms under acquisition—power path, fiber, entitlement risk, capex realism, and the operating cost the model has to carry after close.
Structured readiness gates, turnover evidence packages, and Day 1 operating baselines that translate commissioning completion into SLA-defensible operations—before the keys are handed over.
Shift coverage models, role design, hiring lead-time planning, and structured onboarding that puts the right team in place before go-live—not scrambling for headcount during commissioning.
Training systems, operator qualification pathways, and competency measurement frameworks that compress the time from hire to fully capable operations staff—the operational equivalent of speed-to-market.
OT cybersecurity posture across BMS, EPMS, and controls infrastructure—vendor remote access governance, firmware lifecycle management, supply chain risk controls, and investor-grade risk registers.
ReadyInfra develops and operates its own data centers. That is what makes the advisory work worth buying—the readiness standard we apply for clients is the one our own sites are held to, and the operating costs we model are ones we actually pay.
Advisory engagements are scoped, staffed, and contracted separately from development activity. Conflicts of interest are disclosed before an engagement begins. Where a genuine conflict exists—a site we are competing for, an asset we have bid on—we say so and decline the work.
Independent read on the power path—existing service, capacity actually available, queue position, substation constraints, and what the utility has and has not committed to in writing.
Measured route distance to relevant carrier hotels and exchanges, carrier diversity on the ground, and whether the latency the asset is being sold on is achievable.
Condition of critical systems, remaining useful life, deferred maintenance, and a capex view that separates what the model assumes from what the building will actually require.
Staffing, maintenance contracts, and governance load the asset carries after close—the operating cost that underwriting routinely understates, stated in terms the IC can test.
Gate 0–4 with entrance/exit criteria, evidence requirements, and schedule integration. Each gate has a go/no-go decision point.
Mapped to system boundaries—O&M manuals, test evidence, as-builts, sequences of operation, and maintenance baselines.
Alarm response, maintenance tasks, escalation paths, and emergency procedures—validated before go-live, not after.
Closeout dashboard aligned to system boundaries showing evidence completion status and open items at every review cycle.
End-to-end model from job posting to Day 1 qualified operator—with background check lead time, training windows, and shift coverage milestones built in.
Staffed shift schedules aligned to SLA obligations, facility criticality tier, and tenant requirements. Quantifies coverage gaps before they become failures.
Operations role matrix with clear scope, escalation authority, qualification requirements, and compensation benchmarks for each position.
Structured 30/60/90-day onboarding aligned to qualification milestones, safety orientation, system familiarization, and procedure validation.
System-by-system qualification framework with defined competency criteria, observation checklists, and sign-off requirements for each operations role.
Layered training program—safety, systems familiarization, procedure execution, and scenario-based drills—mapped to the facility’s critical systems.
Evidence-based records of qualifications achieved, training completed, and recurring recertification requirements for each team member.
Structured process for converting institutional knowledge held by founding team members into documented procedures and transferable expertise.
Structured inventory of OT risks across BMS, EPMS, and controls—rated by likelihood, consequence, and current control status. Investor-ready format.
Governance framework for third-party remote access to critical control systems—with approval workflows, session logging, and revocation procedures.
Documented policy for firmware version management, patch windows, and supply chain verification for OT components across critical infrastructure.
Investor and tenant-grade governance documentation covering OT controls, change management, incident response, and compliance alignment.
Whether it is a two-week diagnostic or an eighteen-month embedded program, the same phased framework applies—with defined inputs, outputs, and governance checkpoints at each stage. Every engagement produces artifacts, not just advice.
Rapid assessment tied to the project schedule, SLA obligations, and go-live timeline. Identifies gaps and dependencies before scope is locked.
Operating model, staffing ramp plan, readiness gate criteria, and governance artifacts tailored to the platform, tenant profile, and investor requirements.
Pod-based execution with clear role accountability, weekly client steering, and QA review on every deliverable. Specialists work where the work is.
KPI packs, risk register cadences, and governance rhythms providing auditable evidence of operational maturity—for audits, investors, lenders, and insurers.
An asset under LOI, a facility approaching commissioning, or an operations team that needs to exist in nine months—we will tell you where the exposure is and what the engagement should be.